Surgical approach (where spinal cord monitoring is used)
- Common operations requiring monitoring
- Spinal deformity correction (scoliosis): instrumentation, rod placement, correction manoeuvres, possible osteotomies
- Intramedullary/extramedullary spinal cord tumour surgery: laminectomy, durotomy, myelotomy, tumour debulking
- Thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair / descending thoracic aorta: cross-clamping, intercostal artery interruption/reimplantation, CSF drainage may be used
- Cervical spine decompression/fusion: traction, decompression, instrumentation
- Key cord-risk moments (communicate with monitoring team)
- Positioning (prone/neck flexion/traction), deformity correction manoeuvres, pedicle screw placement, temporary vessel occlusion/cross-clamp, hypotension/anaemia
Anaesthetic management (to facilitate spinal cord monitoring)
- Type of anaesthesia
- Usually GA with TIVA to optimise SSEP/MEP signal quality
- Regional techniques generally avoided if they interfere with monitoring (e.g., neuraxial local anaesthetic blocks SSEPs/MEPs), consider wound infiltration/erector spinae plane blocks as alternatives depending on surgery and local practice
- Airway
- ETT preferred (prone surgery, long duration, need for controlled ventilation, stable CO2/O2, access limitations)
- Duration
- Often prolonged: scoliosis 4–8+ h, tumour 3–6 h, TAAA 6–12 h (variable)
- How painful?
- Moderate–severe (spine instrumentation and osteotomies particularly painful), plan multimodal analgesia while preserving monitoring
- Core anaesthetic technique (typical)
- Induction: propofol + short-acting opioid, consider lidocaine/ketamine adjuncts, avoid long-acting sedatives
- Maintenance: propofol infusion + remifentanil (or fentanyl/alfentanil), aim stable depth to avoid signal drift
- Neuromuscular blockade: allow for intubation/positioning, then minimise/avoid for MEPs (or maintain a stable low level if required for surgical conditions and agreed with neurophysiology)
- Ventilation: normocapnia, avoid hypoxia, stable PaCO2 and temperature (both affect latency/amplitude)
- Haemodynamics: maintain spinal cord perfusion (MAP targets agreed, commonly ≥75–85 mmHg for spine, higher if signals deteriorate or high-risk vascular cases)
- Blood management: anticipate major blood loss (cell salvage, TXA where appropriate, large-bore access, warming, point-of-care coagulation)
Aims and rationale
- Detect impending spinal cord injury early enough to allow intervention and prevent permanent neurological deficit
- Different modalities assess different pathways: dorsal columns (SSEP) vs corticospinal tracts/anterior cord (MEP)
- Monitoring is adjunctive: does not replace meticulous surgical technique, perfusion management, and postoperative neurological assessment
Modalities: what they monitor and how
- SSEPs (somatosensory evoked potentials)
- Stimulate peripheral nerve (e.g., posterior tibial/median) and record cortical/subcortical responses
- Assesses dorsal column–medial lemniscus pathways, less sensitive to anterior spinal artery territory ischaemia
- Alarm criteria often: amplitude ↓ >,50% and/or latency ↑ >,10% from baseline (institution-dependent)
- MEPs (motor evoked potentials)
- Transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) of motor cortex, record compound muscle action potentials (myogenic MEPs) in limb muscles
- Assesses corticospinal tract/anterior cord function, more sensitive to ischaemia and mechanical injury affecting motor pathways
- Highly sensitive to anaesthetic agents and neuromuscular blockade, requires stable technique and minimal NMB
- Alarm criteria: loss of MEPs or major amplitude reduction, interpretation is context-specific and muscle-specific
- EMG (electromyography)
- Free-run EMG: detects spontaneous neurotonic discharges suggesting nerve root irritation/traction
- Triggered EMG: pedicle screw stimulation to detect breach/close proximity to nerve root (thresholds vary with system and anatomy)
- D-wave (epidural spinal cord evoked potential)
- Recorded from epidural electrode on spinal cord after transcranial stimulation, reflects direct corticospinal tract volley
- Less affected by anaesthetic agents and neuromuscular blockade than myogenic MEPs, used mainly in intramedullary tumour surgery
- Preservation of D-wave with loss of myogenic MEPs may predict transient deficit, D-wave loss suggests higher risk of permanent motor deficit
Anaesthetic effects on monitoring (high-yield)
- Volatile agents (sevo/des/isoflurane)
- Dose-dependent depression of SSEP amplitude and prolongation of latency, profound suppression of MEPs even at low MAC
- If used, keep very low MAC (e.g., ≤0.3–0.5) and stable, but TIVA is preferred for reliable MEPs
- IV anaesthetics
- Propofol: reduces amplitudes (esp. MEP) but predictable and workable with stable infusion, avoid boluses during critical monitoring periods
- Opioids (remifentanil/fentanyl): minimal effect on SSEPs/MEPs, useful to reduce hypnotic requirement
- Ketamine: may increase SSEP/MEP amplitudes, useful rescue adjunct if signals poor (consider psychomimetic emergence, manage with propofol/benzodiazepine if needed)
- Dexmedetomidine: generally modest effects, can reduce requirements for propofol/volatile, watch bradycardia/hypotension
- Neuromuscular blockade
- Myogenic MEPs and EMG require intact neuromuscular transmission, avoid continuous paralysis if MEPs/EMG needed
- If some relaxation required, use short-acting agent and maintain a consistent low level with monitoring (e.g., TOF target agreed) to avoid confounding changes
- Physiology and technical factors
- Hypotension, anaemia, hypoxia, hypocapnia/hypercapnia extremes, hypothermia all worsen signals and/or indicate cord risk
- Electrode displacement, diathermy interference, poor impedance, limb ischaemia (e.g., positioning/pressure) can mimic neurological change
Practical conduct: set-up, communication, and baseline acquisition
- Pre-op planning
- Confirm modalities required (SSEP/MEP/EMG/D-wave) and anaesthetic constraints (avoid NMB/volatile, stable TIVA)
- Review neuro status, myelopathy, neuropathy, diabetes, prior deficits (baseline may be absent/poor)
- Discuss haemodynamic targets and response plan to signal change with surgeon and neurophysiology
- Intra-op workflow
- Obtain stable baselines after induction, positioning, and before major surgical steps, document anaesthetic concentrations/infusion rates and MAP at baseline
- Avoid boluses of propofol/volatile changes around monitoring checks, if changes necessary, warn neurophysiology
- Maintain normothermia, stable ventilation, and adequate perfusion, treat blood loss early
- Safety with MEP stimulation
- Bite block to prevent tongue/lip injury, secure airway and eyes, anticipate patient movement during stimulation (protect surgical field)
- Relative contraindications: uncontrolled epilepsy, raised ICP, unstable intracranial lesions, consider pacemakers/ICDs (liaise, risk usually low with modern systems but must be assessed)
Response to intraoperative signal deterioration (structured approach)
- Immediate actions (first 1–2 minutes)
- Stop surgical manipulation/correction, inform surgeon and neurophysiology, check timing vs recent events (traction, screw placement, clamp, hypotension, bolus drugs)
- Check artefact: electrodes/leads, impedance, diathermy, stimulation settings, confirm whether change is unilateral/bilateral and SSEP vs MEP
- Optimise spinal cord perfusion and oxygen delivery
- Increase MAP (vasopressors, reduce anaesthetic depth if safe), treat hypotension promptly
- Correct anaemia/major blood loss, ensure adequate oxygenation, consider ABG to confirm PaO2/PaCO2 and acid-base
- Ensure normothermia, avoid extremes of PaCO2, correct hypocalcaemia/hyperkalaemia if massive transfusion
- Anaesthetic-specific troubleshooting
- Reduce/stop volatile agent, avoid propofol boluses, consider lowering propofol infusion slightly while maintaining hypnosis (use processed EEG if available)
- Ensure no residual neuromuscular blockade for MEP/EMG (check TOF, allow recovery, avoid top-ups)
- Consider ketamine bolus/infusion as rescue to improve MEP/SSEP amplitudes (local protocol dependent)
- Surgical/position-related interventions
- Reverse recent correction/traction, remove/adjust offending instrumentation, check pedicle screws, decompress if needed
- Check positioning: neck alignment, avoid excessive flexion/rotation, relieve limb pressure/ischemia, ensure no abdominal compression in prone (venous congestion)
- Escalation
- If persistent loss: consider wake-up test (Stagnara) if feasible and agreed, plan postoperative imaging and neurocritical care
- In vascular cases: consider CSF drainage optimisation, distal perfusion, reimplantation of intercostals, reduce clamp time (surgeon-led), maintain higher MAP
Wake-up test (Stagnara): key points
- Indication: unresolved concerning monitoring change or when monitoring unavailable/unreliable, used mainly in scoliosis surgery
- Technique: lighten anaesthesia to allow purposeful movement, ask patient to move hands/feet, maintain airway/ventilation and haemodynamic stability
- Limitations/risks: awareness/distress, movement risking instrumentation, time delay, not feasible in all patients (language barrier, developmental delay), may be confounded by residual NMB
Postoperative considerations
- Immediate neuro exam and documentation, low threshold for imaging if deficit suspected
- Maintain cord perfusion post-op (avoid hypotension), optimise Hb/O2, manage pain without excessive sedation
- High-risk cases may need HDU/ICU (major blood loss, prolonged surgery, neurology concerns, TAAA repair)
Test yourself…
You are anaesthetising for scoliosis correction with MEP and SSEP monitoring. Describe your anaesthetic technique and why.
Key is a stable technique that preserves signals, especially MEPs, while providing immobility, analgesia, and haemodynamic stability.
- GA with ETT, prone positioning, secure airway and eyes, bite block before MEP stimulation
- TIVA: propofol infusion + remifentanil (or other opioid) to minimise interference with MEPs and allow stable depth
- Neuromuscular blockade: intubation dose only, then avoid further NMB (or maintain a stable minimal level only if agreed and MEPs still obtainable)
- Physiology: maintain MAP (often ≥75–85 mmHg), normothermia, normocapnia, good oxygenation, treat blood loss early, consider TXA and cell salvage
- Avoid propofol boluses/volatile changes during critical monitoring, warn neurophysiology before any changes
Explain the difference between SSEPs and MEPs, including what each monitors and their limitations.
- SSEPs: peripheral nerve stimulation with cortical/subcortical recording, assesses dorsal column pathways, less sensitive to anterior cord ischaemia
- MEPs: transcranial electrical stimulation with muscle recordings, assesses corticospinal/anterior cord function, more sensitive to ischaemia and mechanical injury affecting motor pathways
- Limitations: SSEPs can remain preserved despite motor pathway injury, MEPs are highly anaesthetic- and NMB-sensitive and can be lost due to physiology/anaesthetic changes
During surgery, MEPs suddenly disappear bilaterally. Give a structured approach to management.
Treat as cord-threatening until proven otherwise, act immediately and systematically.
- Stop surgical manipulation/correction, communicate clearly with surgeon and neurophysiology, note timing vs events (traction, screw, clamp, hypotension, drug bolus)
- Check technical factors: electrodes/leads, stimulation parameters, diathermy interference, impedance
- Optimise perfusion/oxygen delivery: increase MAP with vasopressors, ensure normoxia/normocapnia, check ABG, correct anaemia and hypovolaemia, warm patient
- Anaesthetic factors: ensure no residual NMB (TOF), reduce/stop volatile, avoid propofol bolus, consider ketamine to improve signals
- Surgical/position: reverse last correction, check instrumentation, decompress if needed, check neck/limb positioning and abdominal pressure in prone
- If persistent: consider wake-up test, plan postoperative imaging/ICU and maintain higher MAP targets
What alarm criteria are commonly used for SSEP changes? How would you interpret them?
- Common criteria: amplitude reduction >,50% and/or latency increase >,10% from baseline (institution-dependent)
- Interpret in context: bilateral gradual changes suggest anaesthetic/physiological factors, unilateral or sudden step changes suggest surgical/position-related injury or ischaemia
- SSEPs reflect sensory pathways, preserved SSEPs do not guarantee preserved motor function
List anaesthetic drugs that worsen MEPs and drugs that can improve MEPs.
- Worsen/suppress: volatile agents (dose-dependent, even low MAC can abolish MEPs), propofol boluses/high doses, neuromuscular blockers (abolish myogenic MEPs), deep sedation
- Relatively neutral: opioids (remifentanil/fentanyl), low-dose dexmedetomidine (watch haemodynamics)
- May improve: ketamine (often increases amplitudes), reducing hypnotic dose while maintaining adequate anaesthesia
How does neuromuscular blockade affect spinal cord monitoring? How do you manage paralysis for a case requiring MEPs and EMG?
- Myogenic MEPs and EMG require neuromuscular transmission, paralysis reduces/abolishes responses and can mimic neurological injury
- Plan: intubating dose only, then avoid further NMB, monitor TOF, if relaxation essential, use minimal stable infusion/boluses with agreed TOF target and ensure neurophysiology aware
What is the wake-up test? Describe how you would perform it and its disadvantages.
- Lighten anaesthesia to allow purposeful movement, ask patient to move hands/feet, confirm motor function when monitoring is unreliable or signals remain concerning
- Practicalities: ensure no residual NMB, maintain airway/ETT and ventilation, provide reassurance, anticipate movement, coordinate with surgeon to protect instrumentation
- Disadvantages: awareness/distress, movement risk, time delay, not feasible in all patients, may be confounded by drugs/NMB
In TAAA repair, how can spinal cord monitoring guide management and what anaesthetic goals reduce spinal cord ischaemia risk?
- MEPs (and sometimes SSEPs) can indicate cord ischaemia during cross-clamping or loss of intercostal supply, deterioration prompts urgent optimisation and surgical strategies
- Anaesthetic goals: maintain high MAP/spinal cord perfusion pressure, optimise oxygen delivery (Hb, SaO2), normocapnia, normothermia, avoid excessive anaesthetic depth causing hypotension
- Adjuncts (context-dependent): CSF drainage to reduce CSF pressure and improve spinal cord perfusion pressure, distal aortic perfusion (surgical/perfusionist-led)
What complications are associated with MEP stimulation and how do you reduce them?
- Complications: tongue/lip/teeth injury, patient movement causing surgical risk, rare seizures, interference with implanted devices (needs assessment)
- Mitigation: bite block, secure airway and lines, coordinate stimulation timing, protect eyes/pressure points, review seizure history and intracranial pathology, liaise re pacemaker/ICD
A unilateral loss of SSEP occurs after positioning prone. What are your differential diagnoses and immediate actions?
- Differentials: limb ischaemia/pressure, peripheral nerve stretch/compression, electrode displacement, vascular compromise, true cord/nerve root injury (less likely if purely unilateral SSEP depending on montage)
- Actions: check limb position and perfusion, release pressure points, check electrodes/impedance, confirm BP/oxygenation/CO2/temp, inform surgeon and neurophysiology
Describe D-wave monitoring and when it is used. How does it influence anaesthetic choices?
- D-wave: epidural recording of corticospinal volley after transcranial stimulation, mainly used in intramedullary tumour surgery for prognostication
- Less affected by anaesthetic agents and neuromuscular blockade than myogenic MEPs, but practical set-up is more invasive and interpretation is specialised
- Anaesthetic: still aim for stable technique, NMB may be permissible for D-wave itself, but if myogenic MEPs/EMG also used, avoid NMB accordingly
0 comments
Please log in to leave a comment.