Surgical approach (where spinal cord monitoring is used)
- Common operations requiring monitoring
- Spinal deformity correction (scoliosis): instrumentation, rod placement, correction manoeuvres, possible osteotomies
- Intramedullary/extramedullary spinal cord tumour surgery: laminectomy, durotomy, myelotomy, tumour debulking
- Thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair / descending thoracic aorta: cross-clamping, intercostal artery interruption/reimplantation, CSF drainage may be used
- Cervical spine decompression/fusion: traction, decompression, instrumentation
- Key cord-risk moments (communicate with monitoring team)
- Positioning (prone/neck flexion/traction), deformity correction manoeuvres, pedicle screw placement, temporary vessel occlusion/cross-clamp, hypotension/anaemia
Anaesthetic management (to facilitate spinal cord monitoring)
- Type of anaesthesia
- Usually GA with TIVA to optimise SSEP/MEP signal quality
- Regional techniques generally avoided if they interfere with monitoring (e.g., neuraxial local anaesthetic blocks SSEPs/MEPs); consider wound infiltration/erector spinae plane blocks as alternatives depending on surgery and local practice
- Airway
- ETT preferred (prone surgery, long duration, need for controlled ventilation, stable CO2/O2, access limitations)
- Duration
- Often prolonged: scoliosis 4–8+ h; tumour 3–6 h; TAAA 6–12 h (variable)
- How painful?
- Moderate–severe (spine instrumentation and osteotomies particularly painful); plan multimodal analgesia while preserving monitoring
- Core anaesthetic technique (typical)
- Induction: propofol + short-acting opioid; consider lidocaine/ketamine adjuncts; avoid long-acting sedatives
- Maintenance: propofol infusion + remifentanil (or fentanyl/alfentanil); aim stable depth to avoid signal drift
- Neuromuscular blockade: allow for intubation/positioning; then minimise/avoid for MEPs (or maintain a stable low level if required for surgical conditions and agreed with neurophysiology)
- Ventilation: normocapnia; avoid hypoxia; stable PaCO2 and temperature (both affect latency/amplitude)
- Haemodynamics: maintain spinal cord perfusion (MAP targets agreed; commonly ≥75–85 mmHg for spine, higher if signals deteriorate or high-risk vascular cases)
- Blood management: anticipate major blood loss (cell salvage, TXA where appropriate, large-bore access, warming, point-of-care coagulation)
Aims and rationale
- Detect impending spinal cord injury early enough to allow intervention and prevent permanent neurological deficit
- Different modalities assess different pathways: dorsal columns (SSEP) vs corticospinal tracts/anterior cord (MEP)
- Monitoring is adjunctive: does not replace meticulous surgical technique, perfusion management, and postoperative neurological assessment
Modalities: what they monitor and how
- SSEPs (somatosensory evoked potentials)
- Stimulate peripheral nerve (e.g., posterior tibial/median) and record cortical/subcortical responses
- Assesses dorsal column–medial lemniscus pathways; less sensitive to anterior spinal artery territory ischaemia
- Alarm criteria often: amplitude ↓ >50% and/or latency ↑ >10% from baseline (institution-dependent)
- MEPs (motor evoked potentials)
- Transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) of motor cortex; record compound muscle action potentials (myogenic MEPs) in limb muscles
- Assesses corticospinal tract/anterior cord function; more sensitive to ischaemia and mechanical injury affecting motor pathways
- Highly sensitive to anaesthetic agents and neuromuscular blockade; requires stable technique and minimal NMB
- Alarm criteria: loss of MEPs or major amplitude reduction; interpretation is context-specific and muscle-specific
- EMG (electromyography)
- Free-run EMG: detects spontaneous neurotonic discharges suggesting nerve root irritation/traction
- Triggered EMG: pedicle screw stimulation to detect breach/close proximity to nerve root (thresholds vary with system and anatomy)
- D-wave (epidural spinal cord evoked potential)
- Recorded from epidural electrode on spinal cord after transcranial stimulation; reflects direct corticospinal tract volley
- Less affected by anaesthetic agents and neuromuscular blockade than myogenic MEPs; used mainly in intramedullary tumour surgery
- Preservation of D-wave with loss of myogenic MEPs may predict transient deficit; D-wave loss suggests higher risk of permanent motor deficit
Anaesthetic effects on monitoring (high-yield)
- Volatile agents (sevo/des/isoflurane)
- Dose-dependent depression of SSEP amplitude and prolongation of latency; profound suppression of MEPs even at low MAC
- If used, keep very low MAC (e.g., ≤0.3–0.5) and stable; but TIVA is preferred for reliable MEPs
- IV anaesthetics
- Propofol: reduces amplitudes (esp. MEP) but predictable and workable with stable infusion; avoid boluses during critical monitoring periods
- Opioids (remifentanil/fentanyl): minimal effect on SSEPs/MEPs; useful to reduce hypnotic requirement
- Ketamine: may increase SSEP/MEP amplitudes; useful rescue adjunct if signals poor (consider psychomimetic emergence; manage with propofol/benzodiazepine if needed)
- Dexmedetomidine: generally modest effects; can reduce requirements for propofol/volatile; watch bradycardia/hypotension
- Neuromuscular blockade
- Myogenic MEPs and EMG require intact neuromuscular transmission; avoid continuous paralysis if MEPs/EMG needed
- If some relaxation required, use short-acting agent and maintain a consistent low level with monitoring (e.g., TOF target agreed) to avoid confounding changes
- Physiology and technical factors
- Hypotension, anaemia, hypoxia, hypocapnia/hypercapnia extremes, hypothermia all worsen signals and/or indicate cord risk
- Electrode displacement, diathermy interference, poor impedance, limb ischaemia (e.g., positioning/pressure) can mimic neurological change
Practical conduct: set-up, communication, and baseline acquisition
- Pre-op planning
- Confirm modalities required (SSEP/MEP/EMG/D-wave) and anaesthetic constraints (avoid NMB/volatile; stable TIVA)
- Review neuro status, myelopathy, neuropathy, diabetes, prior deficits (baseline may be absent/poor)
- Discuss haemodynamic targets and response plan to signal change with surgeon and neurophysiology
- Intra-op workflow
- Obtain stable baselines after induction, positioning, and before major surgical steps; document anaesthetic concentrations/infusion rates and MAP at baseline
- Avoid boluses of propofol/volatile changes around monitoring checks; if changes necessary, warn neurophysiology
- Maintain normothermia, stable ventilation, and adequate perfusion; treat blood loss early
- Safety with MEP stimulation
- Bite block to prevent tongue/lip injury; secure airway and eyes; anticipate patient movement during stimulation (protect surgical field)
- Relative contraindications: uncontrolled epilepsy, raised ICP, unstable intracranial lesions; consider pacemakers/ICDs (liaise; risk usually low with modern systems but must be assessed)
Response to intraoperative signal deterioration (structured approach)
- Immediate actions (first 1–2 minutes)
- Stop surgical manipulation/correction; inform surgeon and neurophysiology; check timing vs recent events (traction, screw placement, clamp, hypotension, bolus drugs)
- Check artefact: electrodes/leads, impedance, diathermy, stimulation settings; confirm whether change is unilateral/bilateral and SSEP vs MEP
- Optimise spinal cord perfusion and oxygen delivery
- Increase MAP (vasopressors, reduce anaesthetic depth if safe); treat hypotension promptly
- Correct anaemia/major blood loss; ensure adequate oxygenation; consider ABG to confirm PaO2/PaCO2 and acid-base
- Ensure normothermia; avoid extremes of PaCO2; correct hypocalcaemia/hyperkalaemia if massive transfusion
- Anaesthetic-specific troubleshooting
- Reduce/stop volatile agent; avoid propofol boluses; consider lowering propofol infusion slightly while maintaining hypnosis (use processed EEG if available)
- Ensure no residual neuromuscular blockade for MEP/EMG (check TOF; allow recovery; avoid top-ups)
- Consider ketamine bolus/infusion as rescue to improve MEP/SSEP amplitudes (local protocol dependent)
- Surgical/position-related interventions
- Reverse recent correction/traction; remove/adjust offending instrumentation; check pedicle screws; decompress if needed
- Check positioning: neck alignment, avoid excessive flexion/rotation, relieve limb pressure/ischemia; ensure no abdominal compression in prone (venous congestion)
- Escalation
- If persistent loss: consider wake-up test (Stagnara) if feasible and agreed; plan postoperative imaging and neurocritical care
- In vascular cases: consider CSF drainage optimisation, distal perfusion, reimplantation of intercostals, reduce clamp time (surgeon-led); maintain higher MAP
Wake-up test (Stagnara): key points
- Indication: unresolved concerning monitoring change or when monitoring unavailable/unreliable; used mainly in scoliosis surgery
- Technique: lighten anaesthesia to allow purposeful movement; ask patient to move hands/feet; maintain airway/ventilation and haemodynamic stability
- Limitations/risks: awareness/distress, movement risking instrumentation, time delay, not feasible in all patients (language barrier, developmental delay), may be confounded by residual NMB
Postoperative considerations
- Immediate neuro exam and documentation; low threshold for imaging if deficit suspected
- Maintain cord perfusion post-op (avoid hypotension), optimise Hb/O2, manage pain without excessive sedation
- High-risk cases may need HDU/ICU (major blood loss, prolonged surgery, neurology concerns, TAAA repair)
You are anaesthetising for scoliosis correction with MEP and SSEP monitoring. Describe your anaesthetic technique and why.
Key is a stable technique that preserves signals, especially MEPs, while providing immobility, analgesia, and haemodynamic stability.
- GA with ETT; prone positioning; secure airway and eyes; bite block before MEP stimulation
- TIVA: propofol infusion + remifentanil (or other opioid) to minimise interference with MEPs and allow stable depth
- Neuromuscular blockade: intubation dose only; then avoid further NMB (or maintain a stable minimal level only if agreed and MEPs still obtainable)
- Physiology: maintain MAP (often ≥75–85 mmHg), normothermia, normocapnia, good oxygenation; treat blood loss early; consider TXA and cell salvage
- Avoid propofol boluses/volatile changes during critical monitoring; warn neurophysiology before any changes
Explain the difference between SSEPs and MEPs, including what each monitors and their limitations.
- SSEPs: peripheral nerve stimulation with cortical/subcortical recording; assesses dorsal column pathways; less sensitive to anterior cord ischaemia
- MEPs: transcranial electrical stimulation with muscle recordings; assesses corticospinal/anterior cord function; more sensitive to ischaemia and mechanical injury affecting motor pathways
- Limitations: SSEPs can remain preserved despite motor pathway injury; MEPs are highly anaesthetic- and NMB-sensitive and can be lost due to physiology/anaesthetic changes
During surgery, MEPs suddenly disappear bilaterally. Give a structured approach to management.
Treat as cord-threatening until proven otherwise; act immediately and systematically.
- Stop surgical manipulation/correction; communicate clearly with surgeon and neurophysiology; note timing vs events (traction, screw, clamp, hypotension, drug bolus)
- Check technical factors: electrodes/leads, stimulation parameters, diathermy interference, impedance
- Optimise perfusion/oxygen delivery: increase MAP with vasopressors, ensure normoxia/normocapnia, check ABG, correct anaemia and hypovolaemia, warm patient
- Anaesthetic factors: ensure no residual NMB (TOF), reduce/stop volatile, avoid propofol bolus; consider ketamine to improve signals
- Surgical/position: reverse last correction, check instrumentation, decompress if needed; check neck/limb positioning and abdominal pressure in prone
- If persistent: consider wake-up test; plan postoperative imaging/ICU and maintain higher MAP targets
What alarm criteria are commonly used for SSEP changes? How would you interpret them?
- Common criteria: amplitude reduction >50% and/or latency increase >10% from baseline (institution-dependent)
- Interpret in context: bilateral gradual changes suggest anaesthetic/physiological factors; unilateral or sudden step changes suggest surgical/position-related injury or ischaemia
- SSEPs reflect sensory pathways; preserved SSEPs do not guarantee preserved motor function
List anaesthetic drugs that worsen MEPs and drugs that can improve MEPs.
- Worsen/suppress: volatile agents (dose-dependent; even low MAC can abolish MEPs), propofol boluses/high doses, neuromuscular blockers (abolish myogenic MEPs), deep sedation
- Relatively neutral: opioids (remifentanil/fentanyl), low-dose dexmedetomidine (watch haemodynamics)
- May improve: ketamine (often increases amplitudes), reducing hypnotic dose while maintaining adequate anaesthesia
How does neuromuscular blockade affect spinal cord monitoring? How do you manage paralysis for a case requiring MEPs and EMG?
- Myogenic MEPs and EMG require neuromuscular transmission; paralysis reduces/abolishes responses and can mimic neurological injury
- Plan: intubating dose only; then avoid further NMB; monitor TOF; if relaxation essential, use minimal stable infusion/boluses with agreed TOF target and ensure neurophysiology aware
What is the wake-up test? Describe how you would perform it and its disadvantages.
- Lighten anaesthesia to allow purposeful movement; ask patient to move hands/feet; confirm motor function when monitoring is unreliable or signals remain concerning
- Practicalities: ensure no residual NMB; maintain airway/ETT and ventilation; provide reassurance; anticipate movement; coordinate with surgeon to protect instrumentation
- Disadvantages: awareness/distress, movement risk, time delay, not feasible in all patients, may be confounded by drugs/NMB
In TAAA repair, how can spinal cord monitoring guide management and what anaesthetic goals reduce spinal cord ischaemia risk?
- MEPs (and sometimes SSEPs) can indicate cord ischaemia during cross-clamping or loss of intercostal supply; deterioration prompts urgent optimisation and surgical strategies
- Anaesthetic goals: maintain high MAP/spinal cord perfusion pressure, optimise oxygen delivery (Hb, SaO2), normocapnia, normothermia; avoid excessive anaesthetic depth causing hypotension
- Adjuncts (context-dependent): CSF drainage to reduce CSF pressure and improve spinal cord perfusion pressure; distal aortic perfusion (surgical/perfusionist-led)
What complications are associated with MEP stimulation and how do you reduce them?
- Complications: tongue/lip/teeth injury, patient movement causing surgical risk, rare seizures, interference with implanted devices (needs assessment)
- Mitigation: bite block, secure airway and lines, coordinate stimulation timing, protect eyes/pressure points, review seizure history and intracranial pathology, liaise re pacemaker/ICD
A unilateral loss of SSEP occurs after positioning prone. What are your differential diagnoses and immediate actions?
- Differentials: limb ischaemia/pressure, peripheral nerve stretch/compression, electrode displacement, vascular compromise, true cord/nerve root injury (less likely if purely unilateral SSEP depending on montage)
- Actions: check limb position and perfusion, release pressure points, check electrodes/impedance, confirm BP/oxygenation/CO2/temp; inform surgeon and neurophysiology
Describe D-wave monitoring and when it is used. How does it influence anaesthetic choices?
- D-wave: epidural recording of corticospinal volley after transcranial stimulation; mainly used in intramedullary tumour surgery for prognostication
- Less affected by anaesthetic agents and neuromuscular blockade than myogenic MEPs, but practical set-up is more invasive and interpretation is specialised
- Anaesthetic: still aim for stable technique; NMB may be permissible for D-wave itself, but if myogenic MEPs/EMG also used, avoid NMB accordingly
0 comments
Please log in to leave a comment.